I could just celebrate the last day of summer classes but it would be more appropriate to talk about our class today. I enjoyed the conversation with Kevin, Lauren and Daver. It was good to see the product of the MAC program. They were impressive as far as dedication and thoughtfulness and I presume effectiveness. It was good and sobering to hear about the various ways of using technology and how effective it can be. I think what I took from that conversation was there is a good deal of room for creativity and initiative. Part of what they said did not surprise me. Many opportunities to apply technology to education are probably missed because of reliance on the local (well meaning and probably over-worked) experts in the schools who can't keep up with everything. The initiative and persistence of the classroom personal is needed to take advantage of technology. In some ways this is comforting and in others disappointing. It is comforting because creativity is released through the vision and persistence at the individual level. Often the management types are a couple of steps behind. (That is not intended as a criticism but it often how large organizations work). I am sure that the place of the most innovative use of technology in classrooms is from individual teachers who catch a vision and have the drive to bring things about. Now, I am not one of those people who innovate. But I am usually pretty good at recognizing, supporting and cribbing from those who do (with their permission of course). Seeing that there is room for that gives me hope. I do think using technology in support of learning is very important.
The lack of imagination is disappointing as well. Institutions often lag behind developments in society. But this pattern is so common that I would think we would catch on by now. Technology is one important tool for engaging the digital generation. (The video we saw about that was over the top but sometimes people stretch a point to make a point). Even though I thought that video was a bit much, I do agree that this is an area to be taken very seriously. We cannot legislate it away. We cannot ignore it. Engaging it openly and honestly is important so that we take advantage of the good things technology is and learn to use it at the service of learning. (That Internet thing is simply not going to run it course and go away).
The side discussion I wanted to have was about the teacher union issue. I would like to know what people think about the need for unions among professionals. If there is a need does it mean that we really haven asserted ourselves as professionals? Or does it mean that reliance on politicians and bureaucrats mean the power has to be organized to balance things out a bit? That would have been an interesting question to raise but I thought it would lead us too far afield from technology. So I figured I would throw it out here. Have a great August MACers.
I agree with you that the question of unions is a tricky one. There are definitely some who say that "real" professions don't have unions, and others who say that without unions, teaching would not have become a viable middle-class profession. I think the future of unions is very much in peril in the era of Race to the Top. It should be an interesting few years.
ReplyDeleteCan we propose the roll of unions as a write-in topic for point/counterpoint? :) I can definitely see both sides to the argument, but I kept wanting to ask Daver if he didn't think that maybe some more experiences and more burt out teacher might have been a better lay-off candidate than him?
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting that there's this perception out there that teaching might be "the last career you'll ever have", and so even as a junior teacher I want to protect tenure so I can benefit from it someday... I feel like that's a pretty last-century attitude, given the general trends towards career mobility in the last few decades.
In previous years, Charlie has brought in special guests to talk about issues related to teacher's unions. It might be a good thing to mention your interest in this topic to him at the start of the fall term, as I agree that this is something about which it is really important for new teachers to know.
ReplyDeleteI see the issue of unions being a different animal for the teaching profession than for my previous profession, engineering. The effectiveness of a teacher involves many things outside of the teachers control, such as incoming preparedness of the students, level of parental/community involvement, and competence of the school administration. I'm not against the basic idea of teacher assessment and getting rid of incompetent teachers. However, the push seems to be to assess teachers based on invalid measures of student achievement, like standardized tests. But there needs to be some kind of objective criteria for assessing teachers because if left up to administrators to hire and fire as they see fit favoritism would run amok. For all these reasons I see unions as still being necessary for teachers. When I was an engineer, though, it never felt like my job performance was largely outside of my control. So, I don't think unions are necessary for engineers.
ReplyDeleteHello - this comment is not in response to your union question but to somethings you said earlier on...
ReplyDeleteTalking to my mom about her experiences with creativity in the classroom made me feel pretty good about it all. She basically told me that, so long as she covers the state standards put in place for her courses, she (and other teachers) have freedome to convey concepts to students in whichever way they see best. Every teacher has a really different style, but in the end the same standards are met. Gave me hope as a creative type :)
If what Dana said is not true, I would not want to be a teacher. Media and technology are decent ways to convey information if used properly. Creativity comes into the 'if used properly' part. I am sure there are many different ways to facilitate learning and exploring them is something I look forward to.
ReplyDelete